Following the publication on March 20, 2025 in the Official Gazette (DOF) of the new Ley Federal de Protección de Datos Personales en Posesión de los Particulares (LFPDPP, Federal Personal Data Protection Law), which repeals the statute of the same name published on July 5, 2010, we have prepared this guide to help companies understand the impact of its entry into force.
For a better understanding of the detected changes, the following table provides a comparative view of the main differences between both regimes.
| Chapter | LFPDPP 2010 / Art. | LFPDPP 2025 / Art. | Observations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Definitions / glossary | Arts. 2–3 | Arts. 2 (definitions) / 5–7 (principles) | Definitions (privacy notice, databases, consent, public access source, transfer) are updated and expanded with more detailed language. |
| Regulatory authority | Ch. VI: Institute (INAI) — Arts. 38–44 | New assignment of functions and reference to the Anti-Corruption and Good Government Secretariat | Institutional replacement: functions, resources, and powers of the Institute are transferred to the Secretariat. Transitional provisions repeal references to INAI. |
| Protection principles | Arts. 6–14 (lawfulness, consent, information, quality, purpose, proportionality, accountability) | Arts. 5–14 (renumbered and refined) | Same core principles with greater precision; “reasonable expectation of privacy” is incorporated and free, specific, and informed consent is made explicit. |
| Consent | Art. 8; Art. 9 (sensitive: express and written) | Arts. 7–9: tacit as general rule; express mandatory for financial/property and sensitive data | The operational emphasis shifts: tacit consent is recognized as the rule, but express consent is required in specific cases and revocation mechanisms must be recorded. |
| Privacy notice | Arts. 15–17 (minimum content: identity, purposes, ARCO rights, transfers, changes) | Arts. 14–17 (now Art. 15): additionally requires categories of data, identification of sensitive data, and distinguishing purposes requiring consent | Simplified notice is regulated for electronic media, with reinforced content in the full notice. |
| ARCO rights | Arts. 22–26 | Arts. 22 et seq.: same rights with adjusted terms and electronic channels | The ARCO catalog is maintained with emphasis on gratuity, simplicity, and timely response. |
| Transfers and processors | Arts. 36–37 | Arts. 36 et seq.: requirements for domestic and international transfers | Contractual guarantees (standard clauses) and processor obligations toward the controller are refined. |
| Security measures and breaches | Arts. 19–20 | Arts. 19 et seq.: active duty to implement controls and to notify breaches | Emphasis on notifying data subjects and authorities in incidents affecting economic or moral rights. |
| Sanctions | Arts. 63–66 | Arts. 63 et seq.: updated fines and more detailed classifications | Amounts are increased and specific conduct is classified, such as omission of security measures or processing without consent. |
At Wolff, Arias & Charua we recommend immediately starting a gap assessment against the new LFPDPP and designing a phased implementation plan. Our personal data team is available to accompany you in redesigning notices, contracts, internal policies, incident protocols, and training programs.